← Compare PromptPay vs RTP in the Dashboard

πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡­ PromptPay vs πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ RTP

Thailand vs United States · Real-time payment systems compared

πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡­ PromptPay

Thailand
2025 Transactions27.4 billion
2025 Value (USD)$1.6tn
Volume YoY+12.8%
Launched2017
OperatorBOT
SettlementInstant

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ RTP

United States
2025 Transactions450.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$567.0bn
Volume YoY+31.2%
Launched2017
OperatorThe Clearing House
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityPromptPayRTP
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

PromptPay

Thailand's national e-payment system, a core part of the government's National e-Payment Master Plan. PromptPay links bank accounts to mobile numbers or national citizen IDs for instant P2P transfers, and includes a standardised QR code system for merchant payments. Operated by NITMX under Bank of Thailand oversight, it connects all major banks with zero fees for transfers under THB 5,000. PromptPay has cross-border QR linkages with Singapore's PayNow, Malaysia's DuitNow, and other ASEAN systems.

RTP

The first modern US instant payment system, operated by The Clearing House (owned by 22 of the largest US banks). RTP launched in 2017 and supports credit transfers up to $1M with immediate finality β€” no chargebacks or returns. It also offers Request for Payment (RfP) messaging for bill pay and invoicing. While FedNow provides Fed-backed infrastructure, RTP has a head start with broader bank connectivity and higher transaction limits, and processes the majority of US instant payment volume today.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →