← Compare RTP vs Swish in the Dashboard

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ RTP vs πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Swish

United States vs Sweden · Real-time payment systems compared

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ RTP

United States
2025 Transactions447.2 million
2025 Value (USD)$1.5tn
Volume YoY+30.5%
Launched2017
OperatorThe Clearing House
SettlementInstant

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Swish

Sweden
2025 Transactions1.1 billion
2025 Value (USD)$62.7bn
Volume YoY+4.3%
Launched2012
OperatorBankgirot
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityRTPSwish
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

RTP

The first modern US instant payment system, operated by The Clearing House (owned by 22 of the largest US banks). RTP launched in 2017 and supports credit transfers up to $10M (raised from $1M in February 2025, which is why network value jumped sharply that year) with immediate finality β€” no chargebacks or returns. It also offers Request for Payment (RfP) messaging for bill pay and invoicing. While FedNow provides Fed-backed infrastructure, RTP has a head start with broader bank connectivity and higher transaction limits, and processes the majority of US instant payment volume today.

Swish

Sweden's dominant mobile payment app used by 8M+ people (in a country of 10.5M) for P2P transfers, in-store payments, and e-commerce. Swish transactions clear through the Bankgirot Immediate Payments (BIR) real-time clearing system. Founded by six major Swedish banks, Swish has been a key driver of Sweden's shift toward a nearly cashless society. Payments are initiated via phone number and settle instantly, with merchant payments supported via QR codes and Swish for Business.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →