← Compare RTP vs SNP in the Dashboard

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ RTP vs πŸ‡¦πŸ‡· SNP

United States vs Argentina · Real-time payment systems compared

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ RTP

United States
2025 Transactions450.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$567.0bn
Volume YoY+31.2%
Launched2017
OperatorThe Clearing House
SettlementInstant

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡· SNP

Argentina
2025 Transactions8.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$590.4bn
Volume YoY+2.6%
Launched2016
OperatorBCRA
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityRTPSNP
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

RTP

The first modern US instant payment system, operated by The Clearing House (owned by 22 of the largest US banks). RTP launched in 2017 and supports credit transfers up to $1M with immediate finality β€” no chargebacks or returns. It also offers Request for Payment (RfP) messaging for bill pay and invoicing. While FedNow provides Fed-backed infrastructure, RTP has a head start with broader bank connectivity and higher transaction limits, and processes the majority of US instant payment volume today.

SNP

Argentina's Sistema Nacional de Pagos enables instant interbank transfers supporting both push (credit) and pull (debit) payments via CBU (bank account), CVU (virtual wallet), or alias (human-readable name). Operated by the BCRA, it connects traditional banks and the rapidly growing fintech/e-wallet ecosystem (Mercado Pago, UalΓ‘, etc.). Transferencias 3.0 extended the system with interoperable QR codes for merchant payments, making it one of Latin America's most feature-rich instant payment platforms.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →