← Compare RTP vs SEPA Instant in the Dashboard

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ RTP vs πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί SEPA Instant

United States vs Euro Area · Real-time payment systems compared

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ RTP

United States
2025 Transactions450.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$567.0bn
Volume YoY+31.2%
Launched2017
OperatorThe Clearing House
SettlementInstant

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί SEPA Instant

Euro Area
2025 Transactions4.5 billion
2025 Value (USD)$1.4tn
Volume YoY+87.5%
Launched2017
OperatorECB
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityRTPSEPA Instant
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

RTP

The first modern US instant payment system, operated by The Clearing House (owned by 22 of the largest US banks). RTP launched in 2017 and supports credit transfers up to $1M with immediate finality β€” no chargebacks or returns. It also offers Request for Payment (RfP) messaging for bill pay and invoicing. While FedNow provides Fed-backed infrastructure, RTP has a head start with broader bank connectivity and higher transaction limits, and processes the majority of US instant payment volume today.

SEPA Instant

Pan-European instant credit transfer scheme enabling payments across 36 SEPA countries in under 10 seconds, 24/7/365. Transactions clear through the ECB's TIPS platform or EBA Clearing's RT1 system, with a maximum amount of €100,000. The EU's Instant Payments Regulation (IPR) mandates all eurozone banks to offer SCT Inst by 2025, dramatically expanding reach. Built on ISO 20022, it represents the largest cross-border instant payment zone in the world by number of participating countries. Wero, the digital wallet launched by the European Payments Initiative (EPI) in 2024, runs on SCT Inst rails β€” Wero transactions are included in these figures.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →