← Compare QRIS vs UPI in the Dashboard

🇮🇩 QRIS vs 🇮🇳 UPI

Indonesia vs India · Real-time payment systems compared

🇮🇩 QRIS

Indonesia
2025 Transactions51.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$88.2bn
Volume YoY+50.0%
Launched2019
OperatorBank Indonesia
SettlementInstant

🇮🇳 UPI

India
2025 Transactions228.3 billion
2025 Value (USD)$3.6tn
Volume YoY+32.6%
Launched2016
OperatorNPCI
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityQRISUPI
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

QRIS

Indonesia's national QR code standard (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard) that unifies QR payments across banks, e-wallets (GoPay, OVO, Dana, ShopeePay), and the BI-FAST rail into a single interoperable code. Unlike most payment systems that are a single rail, QRIS is a multi-rail standard — merchants display one QR code that consumers can scan with any participating app, with settlement happening through whichever rail the consumer's app uses. Mandated by Bank Indonesia, QRIS processed 34B+ transactions in 2024 and is central to Indonesia's financial inclusion strategy for its 17,000-island archipelago.

UPI

Unified Payments Interface is a real-time interbank payment system built on top of IMPS infrastructure, enabling instant mobile payments via QR code, phone number, Aadhaar, or virtual payment address (VPA). With 300+ participating banks and 50+ third-party apps (Google Pay, PhonePe, Paytm), UPI processes 14B+ transactions per month and has become India's dominant payment method for both P2P and merchant payments. Now expanding internationally with cross-border linkages to Singapore's PayNow and other ASEAN systems.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →