← Compare QRIS vs SNP in the Dashboard

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ QRIS vs ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท SNP

Indonesia vs Argentina · Real-time payment systems compared

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ QRIS

Indonesia
2025 Transactions51.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$88.2bn
Volume YoY+50.0%
Launched2019
OperatorBank Indonesia
SettlementInstant

๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท SNP

Argentina
2025 Transactions8.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$590.4bn
Volume YoY+2.6%
Launched2016
OperatorBCRA
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityQRISSNP
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

QRIS

Indonesia's national QR code standard (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard) that unifies QR payments across banks, e-wallets (GoPay, OVO, Dana, ShopeePay), and the BI-FAST rail into a single interoperable code. Unlike most payment systems that are a single rail, QRIS is a multi-rail standard โ€” merchants display one QR code that consumers can scan with any participating app, with settlement happening through whichever rail the consumer's app uses. Mandated by Bank Indonesia, QRIS processed 34B+ transactions in 2024 and is central to Indonesia's financial inclusion strategy for its 17,000-island archipelago.

SNP

Argentina's Sistema Nacional de Pagos enables instant interbank transfers supporting both push (credit) and pull (debit) payments via CBU (bank account), CVU (virtual wallet), or alias (human-readable name). Operated by the BCRA, it connects traditional banks and the rapidly growing fintech/e-wallet ecosystem (Mercado Pago, Ualรก, etc.). Transferencias 3.0 extended the system with interoperable QR codes for merchant payments, making it one of Latin America's most feature-rich instant payment platforms.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →