← Compare QRIS vs RTP in the Dashboard

🇮🇩 QRIS vs 🇺🇸 RTP

Indonesia vs United States · Real-time payment systems compared

🇮🇩 QRIS

Indonesia
2025 Transactions51.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$88.2bn
Volume YoY+50.0%
Launched2019
OperatorBank Indonesia
SettlementInstant

🇺🇸 RTP

United States
2025 Transactions450.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$567.0bn
Volume YoY+31.2%
Launched2017
OperatorThe Clearing House
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityQRISRTP
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

QRIS

Indonesia's national QR code standard (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard) that unifies QR payments across banks, e-wallets (GoPay, OVO, Dana, ShopeePay), and the BI-FAST rail into a single interoperable code. Unlike most payment systems that are a single rail, QRIS is a multi-rail standard — merchants display one QR code that consumers can scan with any participating app, with settlement happening through whichever rail the consumer's app uses. Mandated by Bank Indonesia, QRIS processed 34B+ transactions in 2024 and is central to Indonesia's financial inclusion strategy for its 17,000-island archipelago.

RTP

The first modern US instant payment system, operated by The Clearing House (owned by 22 of the largest US banks). RTP launched in 2017 and supports credit transfers up to $1M with immediate finality — no chargebacks or returns. It also offers Request for Payment (RfP) messaging for bill pay and invoicing. While FedNow provides Fed-backed infrastructure, RTP has a head start with broader bank connectivity and higher transaction limits, and processes the majority of US instant payment volume today.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →