← Compare FAST vs RTP in the Dashboard

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ FAST vs πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ RTP

Singapore vs United States · Real-time payment systems compared

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ FAST

Singapore
2025 Transactions642.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$629.2bn
Volume YoY+28.4%
Launched2014
OperatorMAS
SettlementInstant

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ RTP

United States
2025 Transactions447.2 million
2025 Value (USD)$1.5tn
Volume YoY+30.5%
Launched2017
OperatorThe Clearing House
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityFASTRTP
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

FAST

Singapore's two-layer instant payment infrastructure: FAST (Fast And Secure Transfers, 2014) provides the real-time clearing rail, while PayNow (2017) adds a proxy-based overlay allowing transfers via mobile number, NRIC/FIN, UEN, or VPA. PayNow has cross-border linkages with India's UPI, Thailand's PromptPay, and Malaysia's DuitNow. Governed by the Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) under MAS oversight, the system supports P2P, P2M, and government disbursements with no transaction fees for individuals.

RTP

The first modern US instant payment system, operated by The Clearing House (owned by 22 of the largest US banks). RTP launched in 2017 and supports credit transfers up to $10M (raised from $1M in February 2025, which is why network value jumped sharply that year) with immediate finality β€” no chargebacks or returns. It also offers Request for Payment (RfP) messaging for bill pay and invoicing. While FedNow provides Fed-backed infrastructure, RTP has a head start with broader bank connectivity and higher transaction limits, and processes the majority of US instant payment volume today.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →