← Compare FAST vs Pix in the Dashboard

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ FAST vs πŸ‡§πŸ‡· Pix

Singapore vs Brazil · Real-time payment systems compared

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ FAST

Singapore
2025 Transactions642.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$624.4bn
Volume YoY+28.4%
Launched2014
OperatorMAS
SettlementInstant

πŸ‡§πŸ‡· Pix

Brazil
2025 Transactions71.3 billion
2025 Value (USD)$5.9tn
Volume YoY+26.7%
Launched2020
OperatorBCB
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityFASTPix
QR Code Payments◐✓
Wallet Support◐◐
24/7 Availability✓✓
Cross-Border✓—
ISO 20022✓✓
Request to Pay—✓
Open API◐✓
Alias/Proxy✓✓

About each system

FAST

Singapore's two-layer instant payment infrastructure: FAST (Fast And Secure Transfers, 2014) provides the real-time clearing rail, while PayNow (2017) adds a proxy-based overlay allowing transfers via mobile number, NRIC/FIN, UEN, or VPA. PayNow has cross-border linkages with India's UPI, Thailand's PromptPay, and Malaysia's DuitNow. Governed by the Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) under MAS oversight, the system supports P2P, P2M, and government disbursements with no transaction fees for individuals.

Pix

Brazil's instant payment system created by the central bank, supporting P2P, P2B, B2B, QR codes, and bill payments. Pix reached 160M+ users within 3 years of launch, making it one of the fastest-adopted payment systems in history. Transactions are free for individuals, settle in under 10 seconds 24/7, and can be initiated via QR code, CPF/CNPJ tax ID, phone number, or email. Pix has largely replaced cash, boletos, and card-based debit in everyday Brazilian commerce.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →