← Compare M-Pesa vs FAST in the Dashboard

πŸ‡°πŸ‡ͺ M-Pesa vs πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ FAST

Kenya vs Singapore · Real-time payment systems compared

πŸ‡°πŸ‡ͺ M-Pesa

Kenya
2025 Transactions37.1 billion
2025 Value (USD)$294.8bn
Volume YoY+31.1%
Launched2007
OperatorSafaricom
SettlementInstant

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ FAST

Singapore
2025 Transactions615.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$603.1bn
Volume YoY+23.0%
Launched2014
OperatorMAS
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityM-PesaFAST
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

M-Pesa

Africa's pioneering mobile money platform that revolutionised financial services by enabling P2P transfers, bill payments, merchant payments, savings, and loans via basic SMS or smartphone app β€” no bank account required. Launched by Safaricom in Kenya in 2007, M-Pesa now serves 60M+ active users across Kenya, Tanzania, DRC, Mozambique, and other African markets. It processes more transactions than many traditional banking systems and has become a textbook case study in financial inclusion, reaching unbanked populations through mobile-first design and agent networks. Note: Data follows Safaricom's fiscal year ending March (e.g. "2025" = April 2024 – March 2025).

FAST

Singapore's two-layer instant payment infrastructure: FAST (Fast And Secure Transfers, 2014) provides the real-time clearing rail, while PayNow (2017) adds a proxy-based overlay allowing transfers via mobile number, NRIC/FIN, UEN, or VPA. PayNow has cross-border linkages with India's UPI, Thailand's PromptPay, and Malaysia's DuitNow. Governed by the Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) under MAS oversight, the system supports P2P, P2M, and government disbursements with no transaction fees for individuals.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →