← Compare InstaPay vs Raast in the Dashboard

🇵🇭 InstaPay vs 🇵🇰 Raast

Philippines vs Pakistan · Real-time payment systems compared

🇵🇭 InstaPay

Philippines
2025 Transactions4.7 billion
2025 Value (USD)$196.4bn
Volume YoY+230.9%
Launched2018
OperatorBSP
SettlementInstant

🇵🇰 Raast

Pakistan
2025 Transactions2.1 billion
2025 Value (USD)$90.0bn
Volume YoY+40.0%
Launched2021
OperatorSBP
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityInstaPayRaast
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

InstaPay

The Philippines' real-time low-value electronic fund transfer system, part of the BSP's National Retail Payment System (NRPS) framework. InstaPay handles instant transfers up to PHP 50,000 between banks, e-money issuers (GCash, Maya), and rural/thrift banks via account number or mobile number. Complemented by PESONet for higher-value batch transfers, InstaPay has been a key driver of the Philippines' push toward digital payments with the BSP targeting 50% of transactions to be digital by 2025.

Raast

Pakistan's instant payment system launched by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) as part of its Digital Pakistan vision. Raast (meaning "direct path" in Urdu) enables 24/7 real-time transfers between banks and fintech providers via IBAN, mobile number (Raast ID), or CNIC (national ID). Designed with ISO 20022 messaging from the ground up, Raast supports P2P, P2M, and bulk/salary disbursements. With Pakistan's 220M+ population and only ~30% banked, Raast is a critical financial inclusion tool. It also includes a request-to-pay feature and plans for QR-based merchant payments.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →