← Compare InstaPay vs QRIS in the Dashboard

🇵🇭 InstaPay vs 🇮🇩 QRIS

Philippines vs Indonesia · Real-time payment systems compared

🇵🇭 InstaPay

Philippines
2025 Transactions4.7 billion
2025 Value (USD)$196.4bn
Volume YoY+230.9%
Launched2018
OperatorBSP
SettlementInstant

🇮🇩 QRIS

Indonesia
2025 Transactions51.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$88.2bn
Volume YoY+50.0%
Launched2019
OperatorBank Indonesia
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityInstaPayQRIS
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

InstaPay

The Philippines' real-time low-value electronic fund transfer system, part of the BSP's National Retail Payment System (NRPS) framework. InstaPay handles instant transfers up to PHP 50,000 between banks, e-money issuers (GCash, Maya), and rural/thrift banks via account number or mobile number. Complemented by PESONet for higher-value batch transfers, InstaPay has been a key driver of the Philippines' push toward digital payments with the BSP targeting 50% of transactions to be digital by 2025.

QRIS

Indonesia's national QR code standard (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard) that unifies QR payments across banks, e-wallets (GoPay, OVO, Dana, ShopeePay), and the BI-FAST rail into a single interoperable code. Unlike most payment systems that are a single rail, QRIS is a multi-rail standard — merchants display one QR code that consumers can scan with any participating app, with settlement happening through whichever rail the consumer's app uses. Mandated by Bank Indonesia, QRIS processed 34B+ transactions in 2024 and is central to Indonesia's financial inclusion strategy for its 17,000-island archipelago.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →