← Compare InstaPay vs FAST in the Dashboard

πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ InstaPay vs πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ FAST

Philippines vs Singapore · Real-time payment systems compared

πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ InstaPay

Philippines
2025 Transactions4.7 billion
2025 Value (USD)$181.9bn
Volume YoY+230.9%
Launched2018
OperatorBSP
SettlementInstant

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ FAST

Singapore
2025 Transactions642.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$624.4bn
Volume YoY+28.4%
Launched2014
OperatorMAS
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityInstaPayFAST
QR Code Payments✓◐
Wallet Support◐◐
24/7 Availability✓✓
Cross-Border—✓
ISO 20022✓✓
Request to Pay——
Open API◐◐
Alias/Proxy◐✓

About each system

InstaPay

The Philippines' real-time low-value electronic fund transfer system, part of the BSP's National Retail Payment System (NRPS) framework. InstaPay handles instant transfers up to PHP 50,000 between banks, e-money issuers (GCash, Maya), and rural/thrift banks via account number or mobile number. Complemented by PESONet for higher-value batch transfers, InstaPay has been a key driver of the Philippines' push toward digital payments with the BSP targeting 50% of transactions to be digital by 2025.

FAST

Singapore's two-layer instant payment infrastructure: FAST (Fast And Secure Transfers, 2014) provides the real-time clearing rail, while PayNow (2017) adds a proxy-based overlay allowing transfers via mobile number, NRIC/FIN, UEN, or VPA. PayNow has cross-border linkages with India's UPI, Thailand's PromptPay, and Malaysia's DuitNow. Governed by the Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) under MAS oversight, the system supports P2P, P2M, and government disbursements with no transaction fees for individuals.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →