← Compare IBPS vs QRIS in the Dashboard

🇨🇳 IBPS vs 🇮🇩 QRIS

China vs Indonesia · Real-time payment systems compared

🇨🇳 IBPS

China
2025 Transactions17.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$39.3tn
Volume YoY+2.3%
Launched2010
OperatorPBC
SettlementNear-instant

🇮🇩 QRIS

Indonesia
2025 Transactions51.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$88.2bn
Volume YoY+50.0%
Launched2019
OperatorBank Indonesia
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityIBPSQRIS
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

IBPS

China's Internet Banking Payment System processes 24/7 interbank transfers across the country's massive banking network, operated by the China National Clearing Center (CNCC) under the People's Bank of China. IBPS handles both small-value real-time payments and bulk transfers, complementing the HVPS (high-value) and BEPS (bulk) systems. With China's 1.4B population and rapidly digitising economy, IBPS is one of the highest-volume payment systems globally, supporting online banking, mobile payments, and cross-bank settlement.

QRIS

Indonesia's national QR code standard (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard) that unifies QR payments across banks, e-wallets (GoPay, OVO, Dana, ShopeePay), and the BI-FAST rail into a single interoperable code. Unlike most payment systems that are a single rail, QRIS is a multi-rail standard — merchants display one QR code that consumers can scan with any participating app, with settlement happening through whichever rail the consumer's app uses. Mandated by Bank Indonesia, QRIS processed 34B+ transactions in 2024 and is central to Indonesia's financial inclusion strategy for its 17,000-island archipelago.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →