← Compare IBPS vs M-Pesa in the Dashboard

🇨🇳 IBPS vs 🇰🇪 M-Pesa

China vs Kenya · Real-time payment systems compared

🇨🇳 IBPS

China
2025 Transactions17.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$39.3tn
Volume YoY+2.3%
Launched2010
OperatorPBC
SettlementNear-instant

🇰🇪 M-Pesa

Kenya
2025 Transactions37.1 billion
2025 Value (USD)$294.8bn
Volume YoY+31.1%
Launched2007
OperatorSafaricom
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityIBPSM-Pesa
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

IBPS

China's Internet Banking Payment System processes 24/7 interbank transfers across the country's massive banking network, operated by the China National Clearing Center (CNCC) under the People's Bank of China. IBPS handles both small-value real-time payments and bulk transfers, complementing the HVPS (high-value) and BEPS (bulk) systems. With China's 1.4B population and rapidly digitising economy, IBPS is one of the highest-volume payment systems globally, supporting online banking, mobile payments, and cross-bank settlement.

M-Pesa

Africa's pioneering mobile money platform that revolutionised financial services by enabling P2P transfers, bill payments, merchant payments, savings, and loans via basic SMS or smartphone app — no bank account required. Launched by Safaricom in Kenya in 2007, M-Pesa now serves 60M+ active users across Kenya, Tanzania, DRC, Mozambique, and other African markets. It processes more transactions than many traditional banking systems and has become a textbook case study in financial inclusion, reaching unbanked populations through mobile-first design and agent networks. Note: Data follows Safaricom's fiscal year ending March (e.g. "2025" = April 2024 – March 2025).

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →