← Compare Faster Payments vs SNP in the Dashboard

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Faster Payments vs πŸ‡¦πŸ‡· SNP

United Kingdom vs Argentina · Real-time payment systems compared

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Faster Payments

United Kingdom
2025 Transactions4.7 billion
2025 Value (USD)$4.4tn
Volume YoY+10.8%
Launched2008
OperatorPay.UK
SettlementInstant

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡· SNP

Argentina
2025 Transactions8.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$590.4bn
Volume YoY+2.6%
Launched2016
OperatorBCRA
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityFaster PaymentsSNP
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

Faster Payments

The UK's core instant payment system handling bank-to-bank transfers up to Β£1M, with most payments arriving in seconds. Originally launched with a Β£10K limit in 2008, it was one of the world's first real-time retail payment systems. Settles via the Bank of England's RTGS system with net deferred settlement. Managed by Pay.UK, the FPS rail also processes standing orders and forward-dated payments, but the data shown here covers Single Immediate Payments only β€” the real-time component. The New Payments Architecture (NPA) programme is modernising FPS with ISO 20022 messaging.

SNP

Argentina's Sistema Nacional de Pagos enables instant interbank transfers supporting both push (credit) and pull (debit) payments via CBU (bank account), CVU (virtual wallet), or alias (human-readable name). Operated by the BCRA, it connects traditional banks and the rapidly growing fintech/e-wallet ecosystem (Mercado Pago, UalΓ‘, etc.). Transferencias 3.0 extended the system with interoperable QR codes for merchant payments, making it one of Latin America's most feature-rich instant payment platforms.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →