← Compare Faster Payments vs InstaPay in the Dashboard

🇬🇧 Faster Payments vs 🇵🇭 InstaPay

United Kingdom vs Philippines · Real-time payment systems compared

🇬🇧 Faster Payments

United Kingdom
2025 Transactions4.7 billion
2025 Value (USD)$4.4tn
Volume YoY+10.8%
Launched2008
OperatorPay.UK
SettlementInstant

🇵🇭 InstaPay

Philippines
2025 Transactions4.7 billion
2025 Value (USD)$196.4bn
Volume YoY+230.9%
Launched2018
OperatorBSP
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityFaster PaymentsInstaPay
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

Faster Payments

The UK's core instant payment system handling bank-to-bank transfers up to £1M, with most payments arriving in seconds. Originally launched with a £10K limit in 2008, it was one of the world's first real-time retail payment systems. Settles via the Bank of England's RTGS system with net deferred settlement. Managed by Pay.UK, the FPS rail also processes standing orders and forward-dated payments, but the data shown here covers Single Immediate Payments only — the real-time component. The New Payments Architecture (NPA) programme is modernising FPS with ISO 20022 messaging.

InstaPay

The Philippines' real-time low-value electronic fund transfer system, part of the BSP's National Retail Payment System (NRPS) framework. InstaPay handles instant transfers up to PHP 50,000 between banks, e-money issuers (GCash, Maya), and rural/thrift banks via account number or mobile number. Complemented by PESONet for higher-value batch transfers, InstaPay has been a key driver of the Philippines' push toward digital payments with the BSP targeting 50% of transactions to be digital by 2025.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →