← Compare FPS vs Swish in the Dashboard

πŸ‡­πŸ‡° FPS vs πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Swish

Hong Kong vs Sweden · Real-time payment systems compared

πŸ‡­πŸ‡° FPS

Hong Kong
2025 Transactions868.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$1.1tn
Volume YoY+21.4%
Launched2018
OperatorHKMA
SettlementInstant

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Swish

Sweden
2025 Transactions1.2 billion
2025 Value (USD)$58.9bn
Volume YoY+9.1%
Launched2012
OperatorBankgirot
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityFPSSwish
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

FPS

Hong Kong's Faster Payment System enables 24/7 real-time transfers in both HKD and RMB between banks and stored-value facilities. Uniquely dual-currency by design, it supports proxy-based addressing via mobile number, email, or FPS ID. Operated by HKMA with settlement through the CHATS RTGS system, it has become the backbone of Hong Kong's digital payment ecosystem with 12M+ registrations.

Swish

Sweden's dominant mobile payment app used by 8M+ people (in a country of 10.5M) for P2P transfers, in-store payments, and e-commerce. Swish transactions clear through the Bankgirot Immediate Payments (BIR) real-time clearing system. Founded by six major Swedish banks, Swish has been a key driver of Sweden's shift toward a nearly cashless society. Payments are initiated via phone number and settle instantly, with merchant payments supported via QR codes and Swish for Business.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →