← Compare FPS vs Raast in the Dashboard

🇭🇰 FPS vs 🇵🇰 Raast

Hong Kong vs Pakistan · Real-time payment systems compared

🇭🇰 FPS

Hong Kong
2025 Transactions868.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$1.1tn
Volume YoY+21.4%
Launched2018
OperatorHKMA
SettlementInstant

🇵🇰 Raast

Pakistan
2025 Transactions2.1 billion
2025 Value (USD)$90.0bn
Volume YoY+40.0%
Launched2021
OperatorSBP
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityFPSRaast
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

FPS

Hong Kong's Faster Payment System enables 24/7 real-time transfers in both HKD and RMB between banks and stored-value facilities. Uniquely dual-currency by design, it supports proxy-based addressing via mobile number, email, or FPS ID. Operated by HKMA with settlement through the CHATS RTGS system, it has become the backbone of Hong Kong's digital payment ecosystem with 12M+ registrations.

Raast

Pakistan's instant payment system launched by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) as part of its Digital Pakistan vision. Raast (meaning "direct path" in Urdu) enables 24/7 real-time transfers between banks and fintech providers via IBAN, mobile number (Raast ID), or CNIC (national ID). Designed with ISO 20022 messaging from the ground up, Raast supports P2P, P2M, and bulk/salary disbursements. With Pakistan's 220M+ population and only ~30% banked, Raast is a critical financial inclusion tool. It also includes a request-to-pay feature and plans for QR-based merchant payments.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →