← Compare FPS vs QRIS in the Dashboard

🇭🇰 FPS vs 🇮🇩 QRIS

Hong Kong vs Indonesia · Real-time payment systems compared

🇭🇰 FPS

Hong Kong
2025 Transactions868.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$1.1tn
Volume YoY+21.4%
Launched2018
OperatorHKMA
SettlementInstant

🇮🇩 QRIS

Indonesia
2025 Transactions51.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$88.2bn
Volume YoY+50.0%
Launched2019
OperatorBank Indonesia
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityFPSQRIS
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

FPS

Hong Kong's Faster Payment System enables 24/7 real-time transfers in both HKD and RMB between banks and stored-value facilities. Uniquely dual-currency by design, it supports proxy-based addressing via mobile number, email, or FPS ID. Operated by HKMA with settlement through the CHATS RTGS system, it has become the backbone of Hong Kong's digital payment ecosystem with 12M+ registrations.

QRIS

Indonesia's national QR code standard (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard) that unifies QR payments across banks, e-wallets (GoPay, OVO, Dana, ShopeePay), and the BI-FAST rail into a single interoperable code. Unlike most payment systems that are a single rail, QRIS is a multi-rail standard — merchants display one QR code that consumers can scan with any participating app, with settlement happening through whichever rail the consumer's app uses. Mandated by Bank Indonesia, QRIS processed 34B+ transactions in 2024 and is central to Indonesia's financial inclusion strategy for its 17,000-island archipelago.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →