Hong Kong vs UAE · Real-time payment systems compared
| Capability | FPS | IPP |
|---|---|---|
| QR Code Payments | ◐ | — |
| Wallet Support | — | — |
| 24/7 Availability | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cross-Border | ◐ | — |
| ISO 20022 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Request to Pay | — | — |
| Open API | ◐ | ◐ |
| Alias/Proxy | ✓ | ✓ |
Hong Kong's Faster Payment System enables 24/7 real-time transfers in both HKD and RMB between banks and stored-value facilities. Uniquely dual-currency by design, it supports proxy-based addressing via mobile number, email, or FPS ID. Operated by HKMA with settlement through the CHATS RTGS system, it has become the backbone of Hong Kong's digital payment ecosystem with 12M+ registrations.
The UAE's Instant Payment Platform launched by the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) under the consumer brand "Aani". IPP enables 24/7 real-time transfers between banks and financial institutions via IBAN, mobile number, or email address. Part of the CBUAE's Financial Infrastructure Transformation (FIT) programme alongside the Digital Dirham CBDC initiative, IPP is built on ISO 20022 and designed for a digital-first economy. The UAE's high smartphone penetration, expatriate population, and position as a regional financial hub make IPP strategically important for both domestic payments and future cross-border linkages with other Gulf and Asian systems.