← Compare FPS vs IBPS in the Dashboard

🇭🇰 FPS vs 🇨🇳 IBPS

Hong Kong vs China · Real-time payment systems compared

🇭🇰 FPS

Hong Kong
2025 Transactions868.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$1.1tn
Volume YoY+21.4%
Launched2018
OperatorHKMA
SettlementInstant

🇨🇳 IBPS

China
2025 Transactions17.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$39.3tn
Volume YoY+2.3%
Launched2010
OperatorPBC
SettlementNear-instant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityFPSIBPS
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

FPS

Hong Kong's Faster Payment System enables 24/7 real-time transfers in both HKD and RMB between banks and stored-value facilities. Uniquely dual-currency by design, it supports proxy-based addressing via mobile number, email, or FPS ID. Operated by HKMA with settlement through the CHATS RTGS system, it has become the backbone of Hong Kong's digital payment ecosystem with 12M+ registrations.

IBPS

China's Internet Banking Payment System processes 24/7 interbank transfers across the country's massive banking network, operated by the China National Clearing Center (CNCC) under the People's Bank of China. IBPS handles both small-value real-time payments and bulk transfers, complementing the HVPS (high-value) and BEPS (bulk) systems. With China's 1.4B population and rapidly digitising economy, IBPS is one of the highest-volume payment systems globally, supporting online banking, mobile payments, and cross-bank settlement.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →