← Compare BLIK vs FAST in the Dashboard

πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± BLIK vs πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ FAST

Poland vs Singapore · Real-time payment systems compared

πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± BLIK

Poland
2025 Transactions2.9 billion
2025 Value (USD)$110.3bn
Volume YoY+22.1%
Launched2015
OperatorPSP
SettlementInstant

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ FAST

Singapore
2025 Transactions615.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$603.1bn
Volume YoY+23.0%
Launched2014
OperatorMAS
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityBLIKFAST
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

BLIK

Poland's uniquely successful mobile payment system based on one-time 6-digit codes generated in banking apps β€” no card numbers, IBANs, or phone numbers needed. BLIK is used by over 70% of Polish adults for P2P transfers, online checkout, in-store payments, and ATM withdrawals. Operated by Polish Payment Standard (a consortium of major Polish banks), BLIK transactions clear through the Express Elixir real-time clearing system run by KIR (National Clearing House). With ~2B transactions per year and growing international expansion, BLIK is one of Europe's most innovative payment systems and a model for mobile-first payment adoption.

FAST

Singapore's two-layer instant payment infrastructure: FAST (Fast And Secure Transfers, 2014) provides the real-time clearing rail, while PayNow (2017) adds a proxy-based overlay allowing transfers via mobile number, NRIC/FIN, UEN, or VPA. PayNow has cross-border linkages with India's UPI, Thailand's PromptPay, and Malaysia's DuitNow. Governed by the Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) under MAS oversight, the system supports P2P, P2M, and government disbursements with no transaction fees for individuals.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →