← Compare BLIK vs FPS in the Dashboard

🇵🇱 BLIK vs 🇭🇰 FPS

Poland vs Hong Kong · Real-time payment systems compared

🇵🇱 BLIK

Poland
2025 Transactions2.9 billion
2025 Value (USD)$110.3bn
Volume YoY+22.1%
Launched2015
OperatorPSP
SettlementInstant

🇭🇰 FPS

Hong Kong
2025 Transactions868.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$1.1tn
Volume YoY+21.4%
Launched2018
OperatorHKMA
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityBLIKFPS
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

BLIK

Poland's uniquely successful mobile payment system based on one-time 6-digit codes generated in banking apps — no card numbers, IBANs, or phone numbers needed. BLIK is used by over 70% of Polish adults for P2P transfers, online checkout, in-store payments, and ATM withdrawals. Operated by Polish Payment Standard (a consortium of major Polish banks), BLIK transactions clear through the Express Elixir real-time clearing system run by KIR (National Clearing House). With ~2B transactions per year and growing international expansion, BLIK is one of Europe's most innovative payment systems and a model for mobile-first payment adoption.

FPS

Hong Kong's Faster Payment System enables 24/7 real-time transfers in both HKD and RMB between banks and stored-value facilities. Uniquely dual-currency by design, it supports proxy-based addressing via mobile number, email, or FPS ID. Operated by HKMA with settlement through the CHATS RTGS system, it has become the backbone of Hong Kong's digital payment ecosystem with 12M+ registrations.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →