← Compare BI-FAST vs RTP in the Dashboard

🇮🇩 BI-FAST vs 🇺🇸 RTP

Indonesia vs United States · Real-time payment systems compared

🇮🇩 BI-FAST

Indonesia
2025 Transactions5.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$333.9bn
Volume YoY+47.1%
Launched2021
OperatorBank Indonesia
SettlementInstant

🇺🇸 RTP

United States
2025 Transactions450.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$567.0bn
Volume YoY+31.2%
Launched2017
OperatorThe Clearing House
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityBI-FASTRTP
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

BI-FAST

Indonesia's real-time interbank transfer system launched by Bank Indonesia to replace the aging BI-RTGS for retail payments. BI-FAST supports 24/7 instant account-to-account transfers via bank account number or proxy ID across banks, fintech firms, and e-money providers. Built on ISO 20022 messaging with a modern API-based architecture, it is one of two key payment rails in Indonesia alongside QRIS (the QR standard). BI-FAST aims to be the backbone of Indonesia's digital financial infrastructure for its 280M population.

RTP

The first modern US instant payment system, operated by The Clearing House (owned by 22 of the largest US banks). RTP launched in 2017 and supports credit transfers up to $1M with immediate finality — no chargebacks or returns. It also offers Request for Payment (RfP) messaging for bill pay and invoicing. While FedNow provides Fed-backed infrastructure, RTP has a head start with broader bank connectivity and higher transaction limits, and processes the majority of US instant payment volume today.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →