← Compare BI-FAST vs FISC in the Dashboard

🇮🇩 BI-FAST vs 🇹🇼 FISC

Indonesia vs Taiwan · Real-time payment systems compared

🇮🇩 BI-FAST

Indonesia
2025 Transactions5.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$333.9bn
Volume YoY+47.1%
Launched2021
OperatorBank Indonesia
SettlementInstant

🇹🇼 FISC

Taiwan
2025 Transactions1.4 billion
2025 Value (USD)$7.6tn
Volume YoY+3.6%
Launched1991
OperatorFISC
SettlementNear-instant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityBI-FASTFISC
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

BI-FAST

Indonesia's real-time interbank transfer system launched by Bank Indonesia to replace the aging BI-RTGS for retail payments. BI-FAST supports 24/7 instant account-to-account transfers via bank account number or proxy ID across banks, fintech firms, and e-money providers. Built on ISO 20022 messaging with a modern API-based architecture, it is one of two key payment rails in Indonesia alongside QRIS (the QR standard). BI-FAST aims to be the backbone of Indonesia's digital financial infrastructure for its 280M population.

FISC

Taiwan's shared interbank real-time rail, operated by FISC (Financial Information Service Co.). Carries both institutional flows and consumer traffic — real-time transfers in every Taiwanese bank's mobile app, any-bank ATM withdrawals, and TWQR merchant payments. TWQR is FISC's national interoperable QR-code standard (launched 2019), used by consumer wallets Line Pay Money, JKO Pay, iPass Money and Pi 拍錢包. Live 24/7 since 1991, connecting 107 institutions, handling TWD plus five foreign currencies (USD, RMB, JPY, EUR, AUD). Settles through the CBC's RTGS.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →