← Compare Bakong vs IBPS in the Dashboard

🇰🇭 Bakong vs 🇨🇳 IBPS

Cambodia vs China · Real-time payment systems compared

🇰🇭 Bakong

Cambodia
2025 Transactions1.3 billion
2025 Value (USD)$220.7bn
Volume YoY+118.0%
Launched2020
OperatorNBC
SettlementInstant

🇨🇳 IBPS

China
2025 Transactions17.0 billion
2025 Value (USD)$39.3tn
Volume YoY+2.3%
Launched2010
OperatorPBC
SettlementNear-instant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityBakongIBPS
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

Bakong

Cambodia's national payment platform launched by the National Bank of Cambodia in October 2020, built on a permissioned Hyperledger Iroha DLT with an integrated central-bank-issued digital tenge equivalent in both KHR and USD. Bakong enables 24/7 interbank fund transfers, QR-code retail payments via the KHQR standard, and P2P transfers. Notable for its dual-currency design (aimed at supporting the government's promotion of the riel in a heavily dollarised economy) and its extensive cross-border interoperability with Thailand's PromptPay, Laos' LAPNet, Vietnam's NAPAS and India's UPI.

IBPS

China's Internet Banking Payment System processes 24/7 interbank transfers across the country's massive banking network, operated by the China National Clearing Center (CNCC) under the People's Bank of China. IBPS handles both small-value real-time payments and bulk transfers, complementing the HVPS (high-value) and BEPS (bulk) systems. With China's 1.4B population and rapidly digitising economy, IBPS is one of the highest-volume payment systems globally, supporting online banking, mobile payments, and cross-bank settlement.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →