← Compare Bakong vs FPS in the Dashboard

🇰🇭 Bakong vs 🇭🇰 FPS

Cambodia vs Hong Kong · Real-time payment systems compared

🇰🇭 Bakong

Cambodia
2025 Transactions1.3 billion
2025 Value (USD)$220.7bn
Volume YoY+118.0%
Launched2020
OperatorNBC
SettlementInstant

🇭🇰 FPS

Hong Kong
2025 Transactions868.0 million
2025 Value (USD)$1.1tn
Volume YoY+21.4%
Launched2018
OperatorHKMA
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityBakongFPS
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

Bakong

Cambodia's national payment platform launched by the National Bank of Cambodia in October 2020, built on a permissioned Hyperledger Iroha DLT with an integrated central-bank-issued digital tenge equivalent in both KHR and USD. Bakong enables 24/7 interbank fund transfers, QR-code retail payments via the KHQR standard, and P2P transfers. Notable for its dual-currency design (aimed at supporting the government's promotion of the riel in a heavily dollarised economy) and its extensive cross-border interoperability with Thailand's PromptPay, Laos' LAPNet, Vietnam's NAPAS and India's UPI.

FPS

Hong Kong's Faster Payment System enables 24/7 real-time transfers in both HKD and RMB between banks and stored-value facilities. Uniquely dual-currency by design, it supports proxy-based addressing via mobile number, email, or FPS ID. Operated by HKMA with settlement through the CHATS RTGS system, it has become the backbone of Hong Kong's digital payment ecosystem with 12M+ registrations.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →