← Compare Bakong vs CliQ in the Dashboard

🇰🇭 Bakong vs 🇯🇴 CliQ

Cambodia vs Jordan · Real-time payment systems compared

🇰🇭 Bakong

Cambodia
2025 Transactions1.3 billion
2025 Value (USD)$220.7bn
Volume YoY+118.0%
Launched2020
OperatorNBC
SettlementInstant

🇯🇴 CliQ

Jordan
2025 Transactions167.9 million
2025 Value (USD)$28.2bn
Volume YoY+100.1%
Launched2020
OperatorJoPACC
SettlementInstant

Key differences

Infrastructure comparison

CapabilityBakongCliQ
QR Code Payments
Wallet Support
24/7 Availability
Cross-Border
ISO 20022
Request to Pay
Open API
Alias/Proxy

About each system

Bakong

Cambodia's national payment platform launched by the National Bank of Cambodia in October 2020, built on a permissioned Hyperledger Iroha DLT with an integrated central-bank-issued digital tenge equivalent in both KHR and USD. Bakong enables 24/7 interbank fund transfers, QR-code retail payments via the KHQR standard, and P2P transfers. Notable for its dual-currency design (aimed at supporting the government's promotion of the riel in a heavily dollarised economy) and its extensive cross-border interoperability with Thailand's PromptPay, Laos' LAPNet, Vietnam's NAPAS and India's UPI.

CliQ

Jordan's national instant retail payment service, operated by JoPACC (Jordan Payments and Clearing Company) under Central Bank of Jordan oversight since 2020. Enables 24/7 real-time transfers between accounts at all licensed banks and payment service providers via CliQ alias (mobile number or user handle) instead of IBAN. Supports person-to-person and person-to-merchant transfers with a companion merchant QR standard and Request-to-Pay features. Domestic-only rail priced at cost recovery under CBJ pricing rules. 2025 volume doubled year-on-year (83.9M to 167.9M transactions), among the fastest-growing RTP systems globally.

Read more

Compare in the Dashboard →